home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.org.sca
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!skule.ecf!epas!nusbache
- From: nusbache@epas.utoronto.ca (Aryk Nusbacher)
- Subject: Re: What harm from a Bad Monarch?
- Organization: University of Toronto - Office of the Provost
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 05:16:19 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.051619.26727@epas.toronto.edu>
- References: <1hvu5hINNpbf@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Sender: news@epas.toronto.edu (USENET)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: epas.utoronto.ca
- Lines: 60
-
- In article <1hvu5hINNpbf@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bq434@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael A. Chance) writes:
-
- >Several people have mentioned that the don't see that a "Bad Monarch(tm)"
- >could do much damage to their kingdom in the few months that they are on
- >the thrones.
-
- I said that.
-
- >Whilst I hope it never happens, there is actually a
- >significant amount of damage that such a person(s) could do.
- >
- >Consider: How much of your kingdoms regalia is turned over to the
- >keeping of the new monarchs at their coronation? Is it inventoried
- >then? Is it inventoried when they step down? How much are your
- >kingdom's crowns, swords of state, thrones, etc. worth (and how quickly
- >could they be replaced)? (Historical note: One of the "incidents" of
- >the reign of Michael of Boarshaven involved the temporary
- >"disappearance" and damaging of the Midrealm crowns.)
-
- So you need a safeguard against larceny. Most places use "police" for
- this purpose. What current clever system filtres out larcenous people?
-
- >Consider: Despite a requirement to consult with the members of the
- >peerage orders, there is no requirement to follow their
- >reccommendations. A set of "Bad Monarchs(tm)" could give knighthoods,
- >Laurels, and Pelicans to dozens of their friends, all quite legally,
- >causing major problems for the kingdom for years to come.
-
- Major problems? Like poverty, pestilence, hunger, disease? Goodness me,
- some undeserving people get awards. What current clever system
- filtres out people who give lots of awards to their buddies?
-
- >Consider: The Crowns are, technically, official representative of the
- >Society. Considering the already shakey reputation that the SCA has in
- >certain areas of the US, and by certain types of people (some of whom
- >have large amounts of local influence), it wouldn't take much for one of
- >the more neaderthal types lucky enough to have won the Crown (or a real
- >airhead, either gender, to be Consort) to spout off some truly
- >outrageous half-truth (or outright falsehoods) to the local media (or
- >worse, to some one from a news service) to cause some major public
- >relations nightmares for the SCA, Inc. and a lot of its local groups for
- >years. (Witness the continuing problem with one or two cases of
- >suicides erroneously linked to the SCA.)
-
- As opposed to now, when SCA monarchs are all wise, clever and _never_
- "neanderthal" or "airhead" types, because of ... some clever system
- which filtres out all those who might shoot off their mouths to the Press?
-
- >"Bad Monarchs(tm)" CAN do major damage, if they want to. Thankfully,
- >such cases have been extremely rare.
-
- So a "bad monarch" could steal stuff, could give awards to people who
- were relatively unmeritorious, and might make the SCA look still
- goofier in public? How could a kingdom ever survive things like that?!
-
- Whoa! Nusbacher is getting snarky. He must have spent the day
- sucking up to half-colonels. Perhaps he ought to suck down a bit o'
- Baileys and go to sleep.
-
- Aryk
-