home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.org.sca
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!progress!schuldy
- From: schuldy@progress.COM (Mark Schuldenfrei)
- Subject: Re: Heraldic questions...
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.164805.22903@progress.com>
- Sender: usenet@progress.com (Mr. Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ellis
- Organization: Progress Software Corp.
- References: <725248234.F00001@ocitor.fidonet>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 16:48:05 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- Tadhg wrote:
- Because this *isn't* Hungary, this is Ansteorra, or the East, or wherever;
- in essence, because this isn't Hungary, it's the SCA, and the SCA (like
- Hungary and every other mundane jurisdiction) has developed its own
- more-or-less consistent style that doesn't include everything that
- everyone else is doing. Neither Lyon nor Garter would grant a green mount
- on a blue field, even to a Hungarian.
-
- Tadhg, if I recall correctly, this is inconsistent with your previous
- position on naming conventions.
-
- You have consistently used pejoratives to describe non-period naming
- practices that are not authentic or documentable, lamenting that
- they are TSCA (Typical SCA).
-
- So, on the one hand, you seem to maintain that modelling of period behavior
- takes precedence over SCA style when creating names, but the inverse when
- creating armory?
-
- Tibor
- --
- Mark Schuldenfrei (schuldy@progress.com)
- [I'm just showin' you my opinions: this ain't a gift]
-