home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!master.cs.rose-hulman.edu!master.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news
- From: acharya@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
- Newsgroups: rec.martial-arts
- Subject: Re: Finishing techniques
- Date: 23 Dec 1992 15:15:14 GMT
- Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
- Lines: 13
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <1h9vq2INNrin@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
- References: <1992Dec10.210038.29499@reed.edu> <42441@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> <1992Dec13.143844.298@cs.mun.ca> <1275@xlnt.COM>,<1992Dec22.213138.11713@esseye.si.com>
- Reply-To: acharya@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra.rose-hulman.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec22.213138.11713@esseye.si.com>, moore@esseye.si.com (David Moore) writes:
- >I'm lost! My knowledge of Aiki(do) indicates that locks do not (I repeat
- >do not) rely on pain for effectiveness. If you've been taught that, then
- >I believe someone is feeding you @#$%. Yes, pain is nice, but the technique
- >alone should be sufficient. By the way, you can't just stand there with
-
- i agree. i think the pain should be transitory and not the end of the
- technique. even in the case of sankyo or nikkyo i try to move from the hold to
- either a pin or a throw, in other words i try to keep uke moving (and off
- balance).
-
- -mukund
-
-