home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!ncsu.edu
- From: hes@ncsu.edu (Henry E. Schaffer)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: re: Case Capacity of Mag. vs. Spl.
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.024048.9044@ncsu.edu>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 03:35:42 GMT
- Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- Lines: 39
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
-
- A couple of postings have pointed out that the .44 Mag.
- case has more capacity than does the .44 Spl case. While
- this is true, it might not be true when the entire situation
- is considered. This also applies to the .357 Mag vs .38 Spl
- cases.
-
- Here are some specs (taken from the Lyman 47th ed Manual)
-
- Caliber Case Length Max. OAL (lengths in inches)
- .44 Mag 1.285 1.610
- .44 Spl 1.16 1.615
-
- .357Mag 1.290 1.590
- .38 Spl 1.155 1.55
-
- Note that for each pair there is a substantial difference in
- case length, but basically no difference in max. overall length.
- If the two cartridges are loaded, with the same bullet, to the
- same overall length - then the case volume *below the bullet*
- will be the same. I claim that it is this below the bullet volume
- which is relevant to internal ballistics, pressures, etc. The
- difference between the two cases will be the depth (relative to the
- case mouth) to which the bullet will be seated (it will be deeper
- in the Mag. case.)
-
- If the bullets are seated so that the resulting overall lengths
- of the two rounds are different, then there will be different
- below the bullet volumes in the two. But loading to the same
- overall length eliminates this difference. I find it strange that
- the Speer #11 manual doesn't give OAL's.
-
- Therefore I don't see any difference resulting from the
- different case lengths, and it would appear that any load
- safe in the Spl. should be equally safe in the Mag. Am I
- missing something?
-
- --henry schaffer
-
-