home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / rec / guns / 18615 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-22  |  900 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!apex.com
  2. From: chuckh@apex.com (Chuck Huffington)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.guns
  4. Subject: Re: More on dry firing
  5. Message-ID: <9212230117.AA10030@relay1.UU.NET>
  6. Date: 23 Dec 92 02:31:59 GMT
  7. Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu
  8. Organization: Apex Computer Company
  9. Lines: 13
  10. Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Dec21.234414.15865@ttinews.tti.com> hollombe@polymath.tti.com (The Polymath) writes:
  13. #~sigh~ I _really_ should know better by now.  My thanks to all who
  14. #explained and/or chastised (and rightly so).
  15. #
  16. #Nothing in the SIG manual says I shouldn't dry fire, but nothing says it's
  17. #ok, either.  Would chambering a snap-cap and dropping the hammer on that
  18. #satisfy the requirement?  I prefer to play safe with anything that
  19. #expensive.
  20.  
  21. No it won't.  You are going to hear STOP a lot when you go to load
  22. on the next stage and a round (even a dummy) jumps out.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.