home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky rec.bicycles.misc:1779 rec.bicycles.tech:2854
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,aus.bicycles
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!network.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsj!hoodlum!tommy
- From: tommy@boole.att.com (Tommy Reingold)
- Subject: Re: Automatic transmissions for bikes
- Reply-To: tommy@boole.att.com
- Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ, USA
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 21:09:42 GMT
- Message-ID: <tommy.725663382@hoodlum>
- Originator: tommy@hoodlum
- References: <1992Dec27.224239.2958@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca> <1992Dec29.002126.20206@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (NetNews Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hoodlum.l1135.nj.att.com
- Lines: 27
-
- pardo@cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) writes:
-
- $ The basic issue is that the demands of a transmission on a
- $ high-performance bicycle are much harder to deal with than
- $ the demands on a high-performance car.
-
- I agree with this, so in general I agree with your article. I
- disagree with one point:
-
- $ - Cars generally get by with 4 to 6 speeds. Bikes often
- $ have more to choose from so there is more work involved in
- $ deciding which gear to be in. There are more gears because
- $ human engines are much sensitive about gearing, which makes
- $ it all the more important to be in the right gear.
- $ [...]
-
- Since a human can produce a lot more torque than a car engine, it is
- really less sensitive to gearing. You can ride a bicycle with one gear
- and cover almost all of the terrain that you can on a multi-gear bike.
- This is not true of cars. (Actually, I'm not sure if the higher torque
- of the human engine is the reason for this.) Gearing is for
- convenience. I will not to refute the value of gears, though; I will
- keep mine.
- --
- Tommy Reingold
- AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
- tommy@boole.att.com or att!boole!tommy
-