home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.kids:31122 soc.men:21821 alt.atheism:24293
- Newsgroups: misc.kids,soc.men,alt.atheism
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: A few facts about circumcision
- Message-ID: <BzsDyr.LoB@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <NELSON.92Dec20214732@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <1992Dec21.040342.7660@cs.mun.ca> <1992Dec23.212644.17727@netnews.noc.drexel.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 23:16:02 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- <1992Dec23.212644.17727@netnews.noc.drexel.edu> giamomj@duvm.ocs.drexel.edu (Mike G.) writes:
- ><NELSON.92Dec23140510@cheetah.clarkson.edu> Russ Nelson,
- >nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu writes:
- >>Compare risks vs. benefits. Which of the benefits of circumcision is
- >worth
- >>the (small) risk of emasculation?
- >
- >You don't get it, Russ....the whole problem with routine circumcision is
- >that it's done without the consent of the owner. How would you like to
- >have the engine of your soon-to-be-yours brand new car have the cylinders
- >burned out from lack of oil before you take ownership? It's an ethical
- >thing, man...and if you want a foreskin for erotic reasons, then its a
- >sexual one, too.
-
- And the latter (sexual) reason makes it all the more appealing
- as a way to ensure the religious morality of your children (compare
- female "circumcision").
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-