>free education, government paid health insurance, etc., etc., are all
>reflected in the cost of doing business. Does it matter that government
>assistance come in the form of free programs or cash? Any of this kind
>of stuff can be considered dumping.
>Ultimately, I believe, the people of the country that does the dumping
>will suffer a lower standard of living. This is the price you pay for
>selling below your true cost of production.
Of course, the consumer pays higher costs for what they purchase as well.
In the U.S. we pay higher costs for sugar, milk, grain and other food as
a result of the government supported prices. We also pay higher costs for
clothing due to the protectionism in that industry. Auto manufacturers
had higher costs due to higher steel prices as did all other uses of steel.
It costs close to $100,000 per year to protect a job in a protected industry.
This is paid by the taxpayers as well as the consumer. Congress gets re-elected by continually providing these nice goodies to their constituents. Just this weekend I received a "free" letter from our retired congress person telling us
how pleased he was to have served over 25 years and the ability to provide his
constituents with all of the "free" goodies, we've gotten over the years. Part
of the federal deficit is a direct result of all these freebies.