home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!emory!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel)
- Subject: National Guard & Drug War
- Message-ID: <1992Dec24.233429.2653@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: PACH
- Distribution: na
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 23:34:29 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 291
-
- /** justice.usa: 416.0 **/
- ** Topic: National Guard & Drug War: Expose' **
- ** Written 8:46 am Dec 24, 1992 by esterling in cdp:justice.usa **
- From "JUSTICIA", the newsletter of Judicial Process Commission,
- Inc., 121 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 (716)
- 325- 7727, Clare Regan, Editor
-
- From December 1992 issue of JUSTICIA, page 1
-
- NATIONAL GUARD INVOLVEMENT IN THE DRUG WAR
- by Ed Vaughn
-
- "Our Commander-in-Chief has declared war on drugs. Our mission as
- America's National Guard in this war is clear: make America drug-
- free in as short a time as possible using any means necessary no
- matter what the cots." Lt. Gen. John B. Conway, Chief, National
- Guard Bureau (Spoken at the 1991 National Guard Association
- Conference)
-
- National Guard Goals for the 90's:
- -Goal #3: A steadily increasing role in the War on Drugs -
- involving a rapid expansion of National Guard support of local,
- State and Federal law enforcement agencies in the interdiction and
- eradication of illegal drugs. (Posted at all National Guard
- armories and bases)
-
- To begin this paper, it is best to answer the question, "Why is
- the National Guard so involved in the War on Drugs?" The answer
- to this question goes far beyond the obvious fact that with the
- end of the Cold War, America's military has needed something to do
- with all the money and material that our Government supplies it
- with. The answer lies in legality. As Army Chief of Staff Gen.
- Gordon R. Sullivan said in a speech to the 1991 National Guard
- Association:
-
- "You (the National Guard) represent us in uniform in ways
- that the active forces cannot unless central laws are
- changed. You are part of a Total Army dedicated to
- protecting our values and our way of life."
-
- The "law" that General Sullivan refers to is a law called the
- Posse Comitatus Act of 1879. This law was designed to protect
- Americans against abuse by their own military by dictating that
- federal troops could not enter private land or dwellings, and
- could not detain or search civilians. The key to the National
- Guard's involvement in the drug war is the word "federal"
- contained in the Posse Comitatus law by hiding behind the state
- missions given it by the National Guard Bureau. The national
- Guard has, since 1912, had a two-tiered mission to serve both the
- State and Federal Governments.
-
- Under Public Law 100-456 passed by Congress in 1988 authorizing an
- "enhanced role" in drug interdiction and surveillance by the
- National Guard, Guardsmen can work under Title 32 of the United
- States Code in an "Active Duty for Special Work" status. This
- means that while the soldier's paycheck and other benefits such as
- medical care and retirement come from the Federal Government, he
- or she is working for the state governor and is not under federal
- control. The Guard members involved in counternarcotics
- operations are therefore not bound by the Posse Comitas Act.
-
- Guardsmen in Title 32 status can undertake vehicle searches,
- searches of buildings, and can enter private property without any
- sort of search warrant or any other legal permission. The only
- authorization a Guardsman on Active Duty for Special Work status
- needs to search anything is the permission of his or her immediate
- commander, i.e. the officer in charge of the group at the time.
- (National Guard Regulation 584-3, Section II, page 6)
-
- As of this writing, both the National Guard Association and the
- department of Defense are lobbying Congress to repeal the Posse
- Comitas Act of 1879. The Act has already been diluted in a major
- way. It used to be that an individual Guardsman on Active Duty
- for Special Work status was restricted to 179 days of such duty in
- a single year. As part of Public Law 100-456, this restriction
- was lifted, allowing Guardsmen to make a permanent assignment out
- of drug interdiction. As of today, the average time a drug-
- interdicting Guard member has been serving on active duty is a
- whopping two years and eight months, nearly as long as the average
- Active Army enlistment (National Guard personnel statistics,
- January 1992).
-
- Why are Guardsmen opting to go on active duty? The main reason is
- money. Ninety percent of the over 7,000 Guard members across the
- country serving on active duty for drug interdiction were in
- civilian law enforcement before they went on active duty (National
- Guard Almanac, 1991). These people were earning an average of
- $24,000 per year, the average salary of a police officer in the
- United States (U.S. Dept. of Labor). When a Guard member goes on
- interdiction duty he or she is paid as if they were at war.
-
- Below is an example of the earnings of these soldiers. The rate
- of pay used is that for an E-4, the most common rank in the Army,
- one which an enlisted man typically reaches after four years of
- Guard service and that of a Captain, a rank a Guard officer
- typically reaches after four years of service.
-
- Monthly E-4 Base Pay $ 1250 Basic Quarters
- Allowance 450 Hazardous Duty Pay
- 500 Combat Pay 400 Subsistence Pay
- 300 Total Monthly Pay 2900 Total Yearly
- Pay 34800
-
- Also, remember that only the base pay is taxable. In other words,
- out of that $34,800 per year, only $15,000 is subject to any
- income of Social Security taxes. Also, Guard members on Title 32
- duty are eligible for all active duty benefits, including full
- medical and dental care for the Guardsman and his family,
- non-contributory 20- year retirement, and exchange and commissary
- privileges.
-
- Higher ranking people, of course, make even more. The average
- rank of an Army helicopter pilot or leader of a hemp chopping team
- of 12 soldiers, called a squad, is 0-3, or Captain. When a Guard
- Captain goes on active duty to spot pot patches from the air or to
- lead a squad of soldiers on harvesting missions, here's what he or
- she gets paid by Uncle Sam for the job: (This pay is based on
- four years' service, average for a Captain.)
-
- Monthly O-3 Base Pay $ 2250 Basic Quarters
- Allowance 500 Hazardous Duty Pay
- 500 Combat Pay 400 Flight Pay
- 450 Subsistence Pay 300 Total Monthly
- Pay 4400 Total Yearly Pay
- 52800
-
- Only $7,000 of that ius taxable. You can see that there are
- people that have enormous incentive to keep the War on Drugs going
- full tilt.
-
- Another side of this monetary situation is that of military
- contractors. These private companies have much to gain from
- continued escalation in military spending. Everyone from the
- builders of military helicopters to the manufacturers of infrared
- night vision equipment have a large stake in the War on Drugs.
- Let me share with you some of the prices of some major pieces of
- drug interdiction equipment to illustrate just what sort of
- financial stake these companies have in the drug war.
-
- Cessna Citation interceptor jet $678,000 UH-60 Black
- Hawk helicopter 247,000 UH-43 Apache helicopter
- 127,000 Litton individual night vision
- goggles 6,000 Litton aircraft night
- vision
- system 247,000 General Motors Wheeled
- Light
- Armored Vehicle 785,000
-
- Obviously, these companies, such as Litton Microwave Instruments
- and General Motors, want the Government to order as many of these
- items as it can find uses for. (Source for prices: Actual military
- logistics lists.)
-
- National Guard activities in drug interdiction have been steadily
- increasing since 1983, when the California Guard supported the
- state's Campaign Against Marijuana Planting, or CAMP. CAMP set
- the precedent for the Guard activities that continue today. As of
- October 1992, counterdrug Guardsmen on active duty numbered about
- 7000. As of August 1992, 19,495 National Guard-assisted arrests
- were made this year, almost three times as many as for the entire
- of 1991. Also, figures indicate that 529,756 pounds of marijuana
- were seized by the Guard as of the end of August 1992. The total
- for the entire year of 1991 was 183,281 pounds.
-
- How did the Guard accomplish this marvelous achievement? Simple.
- Guardsmen have searched 120,000 cars so far in 1992, as opposed to
- only 45,000 in all of 1991. Also, Guardsmen have entered 1,230
- privately owned buildings so far in 1992, compared to only 436 in
- all of 1991. Guardsmen, as of October 1992, have made 6,537
- uninvited intrusions onto private property as opposed to about
- 2,500 in all of 1991. (Source: Department of Defense statistics.)
-
- The number of Guardsmen on drug interdiction active duty during
- any given month has increased from about 300 in 1988 to the
- present 7,000. In 1989, the first year that Congress actually
- earmarked funding for National Guard counterdrug activities, $40
- million was budgeted. In Fiscal Year 1992, that budget was $295
- million, which amounts to 27 percent of all non-capital Guard
- spending. For FY 1993, Guard counterdrug budget estimates are
- running about $420 million.
-
- "America is caught up in the most pervasive drug epidemic in
- history. An epidermic that transcends the health, economy, and
- general well being of our nation. The rapid growth of this drug
- scourge has shown that military force must be used to change the
- attitudes and activities of Americans who are dealing and using
- drugs. The National Guard is America's legally feasible attitude-
- change agent." Col. Richard R. Browning, III, Chief, Drug Demand
- Reduction Section, National Guard Bureau.
-
- The following table, taken from the National Guard Almanac, shows
- the rapid growth of National Guard Activities in Drug interdiction
- and eradication. Fiscal Year Participating
- No. of Guard
- Jurisdictions * Missions
- 1983 4 4 1984
- 14 14 1985 20
- 209 1986 21 222 1987
- 25 376 1988 32
- 456 1989 53 1811 1990
- 54 5155 1991 54
- 5815
-
- *50 states plus Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and American
- Samoa
-
- According to the National Guard newspaper, "On Guard," sixteen
- different counterdrug missions have been approved for the Guard,
- including reconnaissance, ground radar support, vehicle
- inspection, marijuana detection, marijuana eradication, drug lab
- detection, film processing, and weapons support. This "weapons
- support" includes everything from the M16A2 automatic rifles and 9
- mm semi- automatic Beretta pistols that individual drug
- eradicating soldiers are armed with and have authority to use
- against civilians with a mere word from their commanding officer,
- to the Hawk missile radar and OV/ID infra-red detection equipment
- used so often now.
-
- The Active Army is also lending large amounts of support to the
- drug war while barely skirting the bounds of the posse Comitatus
- Act. In fact, drug interdiction has been adopted as one of the
- Active Army's major missions for the 1990s. In a publication
- issued by the Army Chief of Staff in January 1990, the Army's two
- strategic roles of utmost importance are as follows:
- - Maintain combat-ready ground forces in the Continental United
- States for deployment worldwide.
- -Participate in disaster relief, emergency assistance,
- interdiction of illegal drug traffic and eradication of
- domestically produced illegal drugs.
-
- In an Active Army publication titled "Tomorrow's Missions," Lt.
- Gen. J.H. Binford Peay III, the Army Chief of Staff for operations
- and Plans, asserts that in the Army of the 90's, "military forces
- are required to provide domestic nation assistance such as
- internal peacekeeping and anti-drug operations and support of
- civil authorities to maintain stability in a rapidly changing
- America.:
-
- "We can look forward to the day when our Congress repeals the
- Posse Comitatus Act and allow the Army to lend its full strength
- toward making America drug-free."
- - Stephen M. Duncan, Assistant Secretary of Defense (Spoken at the
- 1991 conference of the Association of the United States Army)
-
- The Active Army is supporting the drug war in a number of indirect
- ways. The following facts come from "Soldiers" magazine, the
- taxpayer-financed official magazine of the U.S. Army, distributed
- monthly to about a million Active and Reserve soldiers and Army
- Guardsmen and civilians.
-
- -The U.S. Army Military Police School at Fort McClellan, Alabama
- is providing, free of charge, training in advanced police
- techniques and military aggression tactics to any law enforcement
- organization or member thereof who requests it due to drug
- problems in his jurisdiction. In fact, the most often requested
- course is the Field Tactical Police Operations course, which is
- designed for law enforcement personnel involved in marijuana
- eradication programs. Some of the subjects offered in this course
- include courses in shotgun and submachine gun usage, night drug
- raids, and land navigation.
-
- -A Large Active Army unit based at Headquarters, Forces Command in
- Fort McPherson, GA arranges drug interdiction logistical and
- command support for civilian law enforcement agencies. This unit,
- Joint Task Force Six, is one of three task forces organized to
- help fight the drug war. These three task forces are manned by a
- total of 2,600 Active Army personnel and about 400 Army
- civilians.
-
- -The Active Army operates the National Interagency Counterdrug
- Institute, a school at Camp San Luis Obispo, CA, which is staffed
- by soldiers who train civilian anti-drug law enforcement personnel
- in drug eradication and interdiction and also teaches civilian
- agencies how best to make use of military assets in support of
- counterdrug operations. The Active Army is able to get under the
- Posse Comitatus Act in operating this school by staffing it with
- California Guardsmen and because Camp San Luis Obispo is owned by
- the Guard.
-
- The paper attempts to effectively portray the rapidly escalating
- role of America's military in the War on Drugs. While it
- certainly does not cover all that could be possibly covered, the
- obvious aggression against the American people and the military's
- ruthless attack on individual freedom in the name of perpetuating
- their bureaucracy is well documented. Also, this paper is a very
- effective synopsis of what I know about the Guard's escalating
- role int he War on Drugs.
-
- (Ed Vaughan is a former member of the military who is deeply
- concerned about the use of the military in the drug war.)
- ** End of text from cdp:justice.usa **
-