home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.next.misc:23376 comp.sys.next.advocacy:3476
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!steve
- From: Steve.Johnson@math.tamu.edu (Steve Johnson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc,comp.sys.next.advocacy
- Subject: Re: The Future of Next, Inc.
- Date: 27 Dec 1992 03:06:48 GMT
- Organization: Dept of Mathematics, Texas A&M University
- Lines: 67
- Message-ID: <1hj6k8INNki3@tamsun.tamu.edu>
- References: <1992Dec27.015305.27995@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: math.tamu.edu
- Originator: steve@math
-
- Note: cross-posting to comp.sys.next.misc and comp.sys.next.advocacy.
- Original from comp.sys.next.misc.
- In article <1992Dec27.015305.27995@leland.Stanford.EDU> underdog@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dwight Joe) writes:
- > [stuff deleted]
- >I just read the status of Next, Inc. in the latest issue of the
- >Economist. The line in the 1st paragraph reads, approximately,
- >
- > "Next, Inc. has yet to turn a profit".
-
- It would be interesting to see NeXT's books.
-
- >At the end of the article, it notes that a high-ranked official had
- >jumped ship and moved to Sun Microsystems. Mr. Job laments that
- >Sun may yet crush the daylights out of his company.
-
- I'm not quite sure if NeXT should go public. It would certainly
- raise my confidence in the company. The big bankroll from Canon did
- nothing for my confidence.
-
- >So, if Mr. Jobs is reading this, I wish him well and again offer the same
- >advice. Keep R & D in the USA but move _all_ manufacturing facilities
- >to Thailand. For crying out loud, use the Matsushita-designed 64-bit
- >SPARC chip. So, what do you care if people laugh because you chose
- >the SPARC chip? You will earn enough money to _burn_.
-
- I'm not particular about the processor, but the '040 has got to go.
- The turbo was a real yawn of an announcement. The R4000, Sparc Viking,
- PA-RISC, and others are incredibly fast. The microSparc certainly has
- some impressive price/performance numbers. Any of these would make
- me happy.
-
- The foreign manufacturing may or may not solve the money problems.
- If quality control can be maintained, NeXT wouldn't lose on the warranty.
- This would be a plus. On the other hand, the 'buy American' theme may hurt
- US sales. Tough call.
-
- Given the vast array of Unix OS's around (Solaris, AIX, IRIX, RISCos, UTS,
- and so on), it would be nice to see a truly unified OS running on multiple
- platforms. This could be quite profitable for NeXT, if they can round up
- enough programming man-hours to do the ports. Of course, a couple of
- additions to NextStep would help: POSIX & C2 or B1 security, for example.
-
- Out on a limb for 1993:
- 1) NeXT sales will slump. Without new hardware, NeXT could very well be
- crushed by Sun.
- 2) NextStep 486 won't sell due to its high pricetag. I don't think
- Solaris for 486 will fare too well, either.
- 3) Don't expect timely upgrades for some of your favorite software.
- Vendors will be taking a second look at NeXT.
- 4) If new NeXT hardware is announced, we'll probably be disappointed
- by the (lack of) upgrade paths. However, it could bring NeXT
- up to the performance levels of its competition (whoever that is).
- 5) If there is a NS 3.1, it will make a lot of people happy, and
- I'll probably even upgrade.
-
- As you can tell, I'm not a big fan of the NeXT hardware. So if it
- went away, I'll live. I'd just like to see the NeXT software
- mature and develop into a multi-platform OS for the mid-90's.
-
- Standard disclaimers apply.
- ///////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
- Steve Johnson E-mail: Steve.Johnson@math.tamu.edu
- Unix Systems Manager Phone: (409) 845-0906
- Dept of Mathematics FAX: (409) 845-6028
- Texas A&M University
- College Station, TX 77843-3368
- \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////////////////////////////
-