home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!uwvax!zazen!doug.cae.wisc.edu!kolstad
- From: kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
- Subject: Re: The "high price" of the HP48!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.121301.2942@doug.cae.wisc.edu>
- Date: 1 Jan 93 18:13:01 GMT
- References: <PHR.92Dec30222224@napa.telebit.com> <1992Dec31.181700.8722@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <PHR.92Dec31210006@napa.telebit.com>
- Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering
- Lines: 43
-
- Hi Paul,
-
- In article <PHR.92Dec31210006@napa.telebit.com> phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin) writes:
-
- > P.S. -- The prices above are somewhat speculative. "Decent"
- > computers could range all the way from $1500 386SX boxes to $10000
- > workstations, whereas "decent" calculators could range from $100
- > TI-81's to $500 fully-outfitted HP-48's.
- >
- >The computer prices you cite are way too high. I don't think there
- >are any $10k single-seat workstations in the company where I work, and
- >we are a full blown development shop (hardware and software).
-
- I'll take one of these HP Snake workstations with 25" color monitors we
- have here at school. With a 500mb drive and, oh, 64mb of RAM, I think the
- price can easily be well above $10K :-).
-
- > You can
- >quite easily get a 386sx box in the $500 range and I've scrounged
- >together XT and 286 machines for as little as $100.
-
- XT's are ridiculous for running modern software (Mathematica, Derive).
- 286's are sometimes OK if you don't mind waiting awhile and don't need to use
- the machine that often. I think it's a disservice to recommend anything
- less than a 386SX to someone trying to do serious engineering or science
- work, though. Typically "cheap" 386SX boxes with hard drives and monitors
- go for about $1K. And these really are CHEAP PCs -- flimsy keyboards, huge
- dot pitch monitors, etc. Definitely not HP (or even TI or Casio) quality!
- Also, software for that PC of yours is going to run you at least another
- $100 for MathCAD, Mathematica, etc. -- and those are often the student versions.
-
- > I don't know what
- >a TI-81 is but I think my (now dead) HP25 was a more than powerful
- >enough calculator for nearly any student, and the 42S that replaced it
- >with is more powerful than I've ever had a need for that any
- >calculator could fill.
-
- I think you're projecting what _you_ found adequate onto "nearly any
- student." Given that I have a HP-48 that I use regularily, I'd feel
- extremely constrained if I could _only_ use a 42S. (I do also own a 32S-II
- which I use a lot, though.)
-
- ---Joel Kolstad
-