home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!coyote!bbs
- From: cobra@coyote.datalog.com (Ken Thompson)
- Subject: Re: Questions about upgrading to 2.1
- Message-ID: <PuP0VB2w165w@coyote.datalog.com>
- Sender: bbs@coyote.datalog.com (Waffle System)
- Organization: Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ
- References: <1992Dec17.230024.14767@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 03:52:36 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- rdnelson@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Roger D. Nelson) writes:
-
- > I'm using this thread for a somewhat different form of the question.
- > What is the most up to date operating system that is compatible with an
- > ancient, but lovable 1000? I do have extra ram, but otherwise a stock
- > machine on which I now run 1.2. Since I have a few unix-like
- > enhancements and a ram cacheing system for repeated invocations of
- > commands and programs, it is pretty comfortable, but there may be some
- > advantages to upgrading (if the older kits are still available.)
- >
- > An email answer would be appreciated, although I do find time to browse
- > this group occasionally.
- >
- > Roger rdnelson@phoenix.princeton.edu
-
-
- Hmmm...I know that V1.3.2 is capable of running on an A1000 - a friend of
- mine is using that with little difficulties, but for the life of me, I
- can't recall (other than FFS) the big advantages over 1.2 (somebody
- *will* remind me, I'm sure...)
-
- I've heard of others who have run 2.x on an Original...keep your eyes
- open...
-
- _____ ______________________ _____
- |/ | | cobra@datalog.com | | /\
- |\ en |hompson | cobra@jab.tus.az.us | |ucson, /--\rizona
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
-