home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU!fjh
- From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus James HENDERSON)
- Subject: Re: Standard conformance and GCC 2.3.3
- Message-ID: <9300303.1408@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
- References: <1992Dec30.011211.11409@netcom.com> <C02I8I.58I@jrd.dec.com> <1992Dec30.173634.15487@crd.ge.com> <1992Dec30.203555.3615@netcom.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:52:50 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- rfg@netcom.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) writes:
-
- >#20) GCC incorrectly issues errors for the following standard-conformant
- > ANSI C code when the -pedantic-errors option is used.
-
- Basically, you asked for it.
-
- Until and unless you can provide an extract of the GNU C documentation which
- claims that using the -pedantic-errors option invokes an ANSI-conforming
- implementation, then I will continue to hold the above opinion.
-
- --
- Fergus Henderson fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU
- This .signature virus is a self-referential statement that is true - but
- you will only be able to consistently believe it if you copy it to your own
- .signature file!
-