home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!kudzu
- From: kudzu@netcom.com (Michael Sierchio)
- Subject: Re: Appeal to SEI (was: Debugging the process)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.182740.1180@netcom.com>
- Keywords: "sei cmm" "sw engineering" "process improvement" "sw quality"
- Organization: True Love, and Home-Grown Tomatoes
- References: <Bzp0KE.8xL@NeoSoft.com> <1992Dec28.113148.15707@sei.cmu.edu> <1992Dec28.193911.20735@asl.dl.nec.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:27:40 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Dec28.193911.20735@asl.dl.nec.com>
- terry@asl.dl.nec.com writes:
-
- >...Indeed,
- >one of my complaints was that it unclear what a level 2 organization as
- >defined in early SEI materials would DO with their metrics it was clearly
- >supposed to collect.
-
- Initially, nothing. Level 2 implies that you use a documented procedure
- for estimating artifact size -- lines of code, function points, whatever.
-
- A disciplined process needs to be in place for some time in order for
- any measurements to be useful.
- --
- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Michael Sierchio 1563 Solano Avenue, Suite 123 |
- | kudzu@netcom.com Berkeley, CA 94707-2116 |
- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-