home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!nextnet!sangercd
- From: sangercd@nextnet.csus.edu (Carl D. Sanger)
- Subject: Re: Curious problem
- Message-ID: <1992Dec26.071413.15282@csus.edu>
- Sender: news@csus.edu
- Organization: California State University Sacramento
- References: <0w9cwB1w165w@tcscs.UUCP>
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 07:14:13 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <0w9cwB1w165w@tcscs.UUCP> zeta%tcscs@src.honeywell.com writes:
- >The interesting thing is, IRQ2 (for COM3) was recognized as IRQ9. Why is
- >that?
- >
- IRQ2 is the same as IRQ9. The two numbers reference the same interrupt.
- This is a product of making the 80x86 line compatible with the 8088
- processor.
-
-
- --
- Carl Sanger || sangercd@csus.edu
- California State University, Sacramento
-