home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!att-out!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!uw-beaver!uw-coco!mdisea!mdivax1!van-bc!rwsys!root
- From: root@rwsys.wimsey.bc.ca (Superuser)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
- Subject: Re: Why no ANSI C compiler?
- Message-ID: <921227490@rwsys.wimsey.bc.ca>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 20:53:29 GMT
- References: <9212235958@drktowr.chi.il.us>
- Organization: RWSYS Exporter BBS system
- Lines: 78
-
- magus@drktowr.chi.il.us (Louis Giliberto) writes:
- > Greg Comeau (comeau@csanta.attmail.com) wrote:
- > : In article <9212135427@drktowr.chi.il.us> magus@drktowr.chi.il.us (Louis Giliberto) writes:
- >
- > But who would pay >$200 for a compiler on a $99 OS? The point is this:
- > most people have Coherent as a hobby/homework system. If they were willing
- > to spend a couple of hundred on a second-company compiler, they would
- > probably be willing to spend a grand on the OS.
- >
- > Maybe your market research knows something I don't. I wish ya luck with
- > it, but I'm not so sure it will fly.
- >
- > -Louis
- > --
- > ---------------------------------------------------------
- > Louis J. Giliberto, Jr. ! magus@drktowr.chi.il.us
- > -sysadmin drktowr ! lgilibe@orion.it.luc.edu
- > Chicago, IL USA !
- > ---------------------------------------------------------
- >
- I agree with you, Louis, but I think things are going to
- change. Here's why:
-
- 1. Coherent seems to be on a fast track into a fully
- capable os suitable for biz.
-
- 2. Dos is < $100, and yet compilers sell for much more than the os.
- If people think there is some advantage to the more expensive compiler,
- they'll probably buy it.
-
- 3. I believe that the market for 3rd party stuff for Coherent
- has yet to take shape. There is a need for a forum where 3rd
- parties can advertise. As far as I can tell, the net is the only
- effective way to reach any substantial numbers Coherent users.
- With the 'netiqeutte' demands for no ads, it must be really hard
- to get a Coherent application to market. A forum will emerge
- because there will be advertiser demand.
-
- 4. With the addition of X and TCP/IP "set for early '93", Coherent
- will reach a position of competing with most USL systems in capability.
-
- 5. Applications written for sysV can be ported to Coh in a flash with
- a compiler that handles the source. Comeau is in a favorable position
- for people who are affected by the outcome of the os wars and
- though Coherent is a dark horse, its coming up very fast, priced
- for massive sales.
-
- 6. The coff compatibility means that there will be no need for
- big application shops to port anything. The USL binaries should
- simply run on Coherent right out of the box. Your lotus/dbase/wordperfect
- crowd will have their cake at less cost per seat than dos. This
- will remove an obstacle for Coherent.. the lack of applications.
-
- 7. A strong marketing blitz from MWC after X & TCP/IP are stable
- could explode sales.
-
- I buy books from a small computer store nearby. The guy who runs the
- store asked me the other day..
- "I keep hearing about this Coherent. Do you think I
- ought to stock it?"
- No small neighborhood computer shop is going to ask that about USL
- based operating systems.
-
- I highly doubt that MWC is set up to distribute to small stores all
- over the world; that's not what I'm getting at. Just that Coherent is
- taking off in the market place. Attention is coming in circles
- not usually associated with unix-like operating systems. These
- circles are more of 'mass' market than unix enjoys and the potential
- for Coherent seems incredible (IMHO).
-
- Randy
-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- root@rwsys.wimsey.bc.ca (Randy Wright) | Exporter BBS 2400 bps
- or | (604) 581-0518 8N1
- Randy_Wright@Mindlink.bc.ca | uucp ogin: uguest
- | interactive login: guest
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-