home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rutgers!ub!dsinc!news.acns.nwu.edu!telecom-request
- From: thoth@uiuc.edu (Ben Cox)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Re: Good Opportunity For Fraud
- Message-ID: <telecom13.7.10@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Date: 3 Jan 93 23:02:33 GMT
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Reply-To: thoth@uiuc.edu (Ben Cox)
- Organization: Ancient Illuminated Sears of Bavaria
- Lines: 12
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 13, Issue 7, Message 10 of 13
-
- johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us (John R. Levine) writes:
-
- > I think you will find that historically with telco calling cards there
- > hasn't been a distinction made between a "non-secret" part, the first
- > ten digits, and a "secret" part, the last four.
-
- On my AT&T card, the entire number (including PIN) is stamped on the
- card in raised digits.
-
-
- Ben Cox thoth@uiuc.edu
-