home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!cybrspc!roy
- From: roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail)
- Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
- Subject: Re: The woes of ^Z
- Message-ID: <0sN7VB1w165w@cybrspc.UUCP>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 06:13:32 CST
- References: <21Dec92200230@miracle.com>
- Organization: Villa CyberSpace, Minneapolis, MN
- Lines: 31
-
- phil@miracle.com (Phil Hill) writes:
-
- > >phil@miracle.com (Phil Hill) writes:
- > >> Doesn't have anything to do with the filesystem. The DEFAULT mode to read
- > >> a file is "TEXT" mode, in which case a ^Z is treated as EOF.
- >
- > roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) writes:
- > >That sure sounds like filesystem behavior to me.
- >
- > You had better get out those beginning computer science books again.
-
- > Now, on the other hand... the DOS file access routines by default treat
- > a ^Z as an EOF. This has nothing to do with the underlying filesystem.
- > If you took the DOS access routines, and ran them on a UNIX, OS/2, MAC or
- > *any* other filesystem, they would still be braindamaged.
-
- Well, as McLuhan said, "the medium is the message." You're technically
- correct, Phil. But, as a practical matter, where does one separate a
- filesystem from the methods available to access that filesystem?
- Besides, the filesystem IS broken. (11-character filenames, arranged
- 8.3, with no case sensitivity) So, if you ran Unix, OS/2 or MAC access
- routines on a DOS filesystem, you still wouldn't overcome its
- shortcomings.
-
- This is leaving the Waffle domain. Perhaps we should take it to
- alt.religion.computers?
- --
- Roy M. Silvernail -- roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu - OR- cybrspc!roy@cs.umn.edu
- "I like Santa Claus as well as the next guy, but do you really want a
- hard drive that's spent 6000 miles at the bottom of a canvas sack in a
- wooden sleigh powered by airborne reindeer?" -- me
-