home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / comp / archives / msdos / d / 118 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-22  |  1.0 KB
  1. Xref: sparky comp.archives.msdos.d:118 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.archives:5217 comp.dcom.modems:18417
  2. Newsgroups: comp.archives.msdos.d,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.archives,comp.dcom.modems
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!gtoal
  4. From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
  5. Subject: Re: *** WHAT'S THE BEST COMM PROTOCOL {LONG SUMMARY} ***
  6. Message-ID: <Bzoxrw.GM5@demon.co.uk>
  7. Sender: news@demon.co.uk
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: pizzabox.demon.co.uk
  9. Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
  10. References: <1992Dec22.203802.13335@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
  11. Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:33:31 GMT
  12. Lines: 11
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Dec22.203802.13335@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> dml7@navaho.cc.bellcore.com (lee,danny) writes:
  15. :_________________ABSTRACT_________________
  16. :
  17. :Subject: *** WHAT'S THE BEST COMM PROTOCOL ***
  18.  
  19. Your summary missed a less obvious one but one that clearly wins as 'best'
  20. on all criteria except perhaps raw download speed and availability:
  21. tcp/ip - over either slip or ppp - can't be beaten by kermit, zmodem, or
  22. the rest.  You can just do *so* much more with it...
  23.  
  24. G
  25.