home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CS.UCHICAGO.EDU!SAMANT
- From: samant@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
- Subject: Re: My Top 10
- Message-ID: <9212211746.AA09598@tartarus.uchicago.edu>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 17:46:57 GMT
- Sender: English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
- Lines: 13
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Return-Path: <samant@cs.uchicago.edu>
-
- >>>>>setting discriptions. I would like to know what standard W-L usage
- >>>>>is I don't look like a stupid newbie. =:-)
- >>> ^so
- >>>
- >>I find it inconsistent not because of a missing "so" but because of what
- >>it seems to mean.
- >
- >You mean that following standard usage implies conformity, not intelligence?
-
- I am talking about words-l, newbieness, and so on, while you are talking
- about conformity, intelligence and wossname. Now how can I help this?
-
- tushar
-