home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / bit / listserv / wordsl / 49025 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-21  |  886 b   |  23 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CS.UCHICAGO.EDU!SAMANT
  3. Return-Path: <samant@cs.uchicago.edu>
  4. Message-ID: <9212210537.AA02471@tartarus.uchicago.edu>
  5. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.words-l
  6. Date:         Sun, 20 Dec 1992 23:37:47 CST
  7. Sender:       English Language Discussion Group <WORDS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
  8. From:         samant@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU
  9. Subject:      Re: Neologisms
  10. Lines: 11
  11.  
  12. >: It wasn't really necessary - the instructors ignore these things.
  13. >
  14. >I don't.
  15.  
  16. It depends on what you are trying to test. In real life math researchers
  17. are not expected to get quick clever answers to short and tricky questions
  18. within two hours without looking anything up or discussing with others.
  19. And they are certainly not required to come up with camera-ready copies
  20. of solutions. It might be different for business school or law school.
  21.  
  22. tushar
  23.