home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NAUVAX.BITNET!CROWLEY
- X-Envelope-to: MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET
- X-VMS-To: IN%"MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET"
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GSX5IGV9SM0018RJ@NAUVAX.UCC.NAU.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mbu-l
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:46:25 -0700
- Sender: "Megabyte University (Computers & Writing)" <MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET>
- From: CROWLEY@NAUVAX.BITNET
- Subject: Standardizing Composition Classes
- Lines: 17
-
- Dear John: (I like writing that phrase!) I don't see that you've made an
- argument FOR the universal requirement. So the folks in Chemistry and
- Bidness think that FE entails instruction in mechanics. You can educate them,
- if you want, at terrific time and expense to you and your self-esteem. You
- can't ignore them, obviously. But why let their mistaken notions about
- writing drive the huge industry that is FE? The cost comes out of the hides
- of WPAs, TAs, and part-timers in English, not to mention the thousands of
- students who have to sit through those drills every semester. If English
- departments were to say: we know how to teach writing, and we'll do it on
- the same basis that all the rest of you guys do, by offering the best damn
- writing courses around that students will enjoy and profit from and will
- rush to take. If you want Chemistry students drilled in usage and spelling,
- you do it. What would happen? You folks there in Texas know how proprietary
- everybody feels toward the FE course. Certainly the English department doesn't
- own it, in everyone else's eyes. Why is that? I bet you don't feel you
- have any bidness dictating to Chemistry what their first-year course is.
- How come they get to tell you what to do in your first-year course? Grinch
-