home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NEBRWESLEYAN.EDU!CSM2747
- Message-ID: <9212300734.AA18186@NebrWesleyan.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.emusic-l
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 01:34:16 CST
- Sender: Electronic Music Discussion List <EMUSIC-L@AUVM.BITNET>
- From: "Chad S. Mawson" <csm2747@NEBRWESLEYAN.EDU>
- Subject: Re: INFO on Roland for AT
- Comments: To: EMUSIC-L@AMERICAN.EDU
- Lines: 6
-
- I would agree that DOS Cakewalk would probably be better than Windows(and ANY
- software under windows) I use a 286 for my day to day work, but I need at leas4
- Meg's of RAM. I can't recall how much memory Cakewalk/for Win. eats, but
- Windows will slow WAY down unless you have at least 4 (preferrably 8)
- Megs. Sorry to ramble but it's late, anyway sounds like a decent set up to
- me, Good luck!
-