home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!VAXF.COLORADO.EDU!POWERS_W
- X-Envelope-to: CSG-L@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu
- X-VMS-To: @CSG
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GSOYYI1Y2Q006MJF@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 12:03:34 -0700
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: "William T. Powers" <POWERS_W%FLC@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU>
- Subject: Science letter
- Lines: 34
-
- [From Mary Powers (921224.1200)]
-
- The following letter appeared in Science for 11 Dec 1992. It
- should be of interest to CSGnet.
-
- Conflicts of interest
-
- In his article "When does intellectual pas-
- sion become conflict of interest?" (Special
- News Report, 31 July, p. 620), Eliot Mar-
- shall wrongly focuses on individual passion.
- Shared intellectual passions generate much
- more powerful conflicts of interest and are a
- greater threat to scientific progress. Enthu-
- siasts for widely held ideas are in a strong
- position to promote their interests by ad-
- vancing cherished, but flawed, theories.
- Consensus among many scientists is no
- guarantee against major errors in thinking.
- Lone thinkers have only the strength of
- their aruments behind them, yet some-
- times their arguments prevail and lead to
- major advances.
- Proposals to censor unfavored ideas by
- invoking legalisms such as "conflict of
- interest" are alarming. Suppression of the
- opinions of scientists with strongly held,
- idiosyncratic points of view is profoundly
- antiscientific. Individual intellectual pas-
- sion remains essential for scientific prog-
- ress.
- Jerome L. Sullivan
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
- Charleston, SC 29401-5799
-