home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK!AG129
- Via: UK.AC.CAM.PHX; 22 DEC 92 10:38:22 GMT
- Message-ID: <A6C7713D045F9E90@UK.AC.CAMBRIDGE.PHOENIX>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cdromlan
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 10:38:31 GMT
- Sender: "CDROMLAN@IDBSU - Use of CDROM Products in Lan Environments"
- <CDROMLAN@IDBSU.BITNET>
- From: A Grant <AG129@PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK>
- Subject: Re: OED/Licensing
- In-Reply-To: -unspecified-
- Lines: 18
-
- > If some publishers were just as resonable with their electronic use
- > policies as they are with print policies, we'd all be much better off.
-
- As soon as you put a CD-ROM on a network, it becomes _possible_ to have
- multiple use; a site could easily "forget" to install launch control or
- some other single-use serialisation mechanism.
-
- The tragedy is that commercial software vendors have learnt, by bitter
- experience, that the less professional (i.e. staffed by academics rather
- than career systems programmers) parts of the academic computer user
- community are not always honest when it comes to licensing; this has long
- applied to microcomputer software (and many other things; sheet music,
- for example), and there is no reason vendors should expect it to be
- different for CD-ROMs. If the academic world wants 'reasonable' licensing
- policies, it had better convince vendors that it will adhere to licences.
- The way forward is authentication standards and more secure LAN and PC
- operating systems, but these are some way off, partly because the academic
- world itself has traditionally looked down its nose at such things.
-