home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky austin.talk:417 tx.politics:8052
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!lgc.com!cs.utexas.edu!news-is-not-mail
- From: flatau@cs.utexas.edu (Arthur Flatau)
- Newsgroups: austin.talk,tx.politics
- Subject: Re: City Council & CO Ammendment 2
- Date: 21 Dec 1992 11:40:36 -0600
- Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <1h4vikINN5e6@im4u.cs.utexas.edu>
- References: <SCANNON.46.724686473@novell.com> <PETONIC.92Dec18105850@daisy.hal.com> <BzM45J.2E14@austin.ibm.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: im4u.cs.utexas.edu
-
- In article <BzM45J.2E14@austin.ibm.com> alan@auntbea.austin.ibm.com (Alan R. Weiss) writes:
- >[...]
- >
- > That the City Council
- >of Austin made this statement on moral grounds is much to its credit.
- >However, if Max and Louise and Ronny and Bob and Gus and Charles and
- >(so who's the seventh?) are traveling to Colorado for ANYTHING
-
- The seventh is the mayor Bruce Todd.
-
- >on business, something's wrong - and in fact, they *weren't* planning
- >on going, anyway. This is just symbolic. IMHO.
-
- I believe the ban applies to all city employees (traveling on city
- business) not just the council. It still is mostly symbolic.
-
- Art
-