home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!bnrgate!bmerh85!nadeau
- From: nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau)
- Subject: Re: Radical feminists
- Message-ID: <1992Dec24.041754.12970@bmerh85.bnr.ca>
- Sender: news@bmerh85.bnr.ca (Usenet News)
- Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa
- References: <92358.154429HERSCH@auvm.american.edu> <Bzqv1H.6DA@demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 04:17:54 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <Bzqv1H.6DA@demon.co.uk> gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal) writes:
- >In article <92358.154429HERSCH@auvm.american.edu> <HERSCH@auvm.american.edu> writes:
- >:In article <1992Dec23.195637.8547@bmerh85.bnr.ca>, nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau)
- >:says:
- >:>
- >:> ("Gay", after all, is a euphemism coined
- >:>by people who couldn't face the reality of "homosexual".)
- >:>
- >:
- >:Nonsense.
- >
- >Indeed. Perhaps Imhaginary Nadeau could explain why Gay meant
- >(hetero)sexually adventurous/libertine for a period of around two
- >hundred years? Was it perhaps a euphemism coined by people who
- >couldn't face the reality of 'sexy'?
-
- Wasn't it? Why did people start using "gay" in this sense, rather than
- the more direct words - libertine or depraved or sinful or luxurious or
- whatever other words might have come to mind?
-
- Think of all the words people might use today to describe someone as
- promiscuous: "easy", "willing", etc. How many are used to suggest
- rather than state (that is, as euphemisms), and how many because they
- convey a more precise shade of meaning?
-
- These are serious questions, and I do hope to learn something from the
- answers.
-
- The Rhealist - nadeau@bnr.ca - Speaking only for myself
-