home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!oxuniv!wilcox
- From: wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Frosh (was Re: Sexist language (was...
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.142446.10973@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 14:24:46 GMT
- References: <BzG3B8.Kvz@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <1992Dec18.233553.1@indyvax.iupui.edu> <BzJpFu.AG5@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <1992Dec22.214750.1@indyvax.iupui.edu>
- Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620
- Lines: 68
-
- > In article <BzJpFu.AG5@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>, mmmirash@banshee.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:
- >> However, no one has been able to put together an effective argument
- >> that challenges the superiority of English English. I think the
- >> reason behind this is that IT'S A FACT. *No one* can dispute that
- >> English spread from England to other lands.
-
- That sounds like a challenge to me! Here goes. We are trying to demostrate to
- Mandar that "English English" is not superior to the other dialects of English.
- I will attempt a demonstration by reductio ad absurdum on the statement
- "English English is the superior dialect of English", which will have ad
- hominem arguments against Mandar's assertions in it.
-
- 1. WHAT IS ENGLISH ENGLISH?
-
- Answer 1: The English spoken by the Queen. In that case she speaks the same
- dialect as a tiny minority of her subjects.
-
- Answer 2: THe English spoken by BBC newsreaders. In that case there is no such
- thing as English English because they speak several different dialects.
-
- Answer 3: The English spoken in England. In that case there is no such thing as
- English English because there is no such thing as *the* English spoken in
- England.
-
- Summary: "English English" is a spirit summoned by Mandar with no substance.
-
- 2. HOW IS ENGLISH ENGLISH SUPERIOR.
-
- Just for the sake of argument I will ignore my conclusions in 1 above and
- concentrate on the English/US distinction.
-
- For English English to be superior it must be superior for some reason.
-
- Reason 1: History---after independence the US veered away from "correct" English
- English.
- Answer: At the time of US independence there was no such thing as a standard
- English pronunciation or spelling; the vast majority of people were illiterate
- so any attempts at standardisation could only reach a few; it has been
- suggested that East-Coast US English (as much a fiction as English English) is
- closer to the way the first English settlers spoke than modern English English;
- many spelling differences occur because English grammarians preferred
- non-English forms which reflected the origins of words.
-
- Reason 2: Name---English must be judged by England.
- Answer: I defeated this one a week or two back. Briefly if this were the case
- we should not be able to judge most of the world's languages because they are
- not nationally based.
-
- Reason 3: English people say so.
- Answer: The vast majority aren't interested and are more influenced by US
- culture than traditional English culture; those who are interested are more
- interested in description than prescription.
-
- Reason 4: A group of the Great and the Good say so.
- Answer: They don't. Even if they did no-one would listen.
-
- Reason 5: English English is somehow aesthetically better than other dialects.
- Answer: If so that is a matter of personal taste not of demonstrable fact.
-
- Reason 6: Mandar says so.
- Answer: Mandar is not an expert in any linguistic field, he is not English and
- does not listen to reasonable argument.
-
- That should do it, but given Mandar probably won't.
- --
-
- Stephen Wilcox | For Sale: Posts in British Government. Suit
- wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk | outgoing American. Highest bids accepted.
-