home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12872 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11345 alt.politics.clinton:19510 alt.politics.bush:15412 alt.politics.homosexuality:8852
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!kellmeye
- From: kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l)
- Subject: Re: Lifestyle Choices and Secular Reasoning
- Message-ID: <C0B0Cu.Eu7@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- References: <1992Dec30.162502.6756@asl.dl.nec.com> <1992Dec30.185545.26789@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> <C07oBz.F74@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan2.230323.29355@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <C095nK.82y@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan3.041323.16808@netcom.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 00:36:16 GMT
- Lines: 97
-
- harp@netcom.com (Gregory O. Harp) writes:
-
- >"SLK>" is "kellmeyer steven l"
- >"LCF>" is "Lawrence C. Foard"
-
- >SLK>Why is *secular* reasoning superior to religious reasoning?
-
- >LCF>I'm sitting 10 feet from a machine that can produce 3d images of your
- >LCF>internal organs, it was designed by secular reasoning.
-
- >SLK>And it was designed in a country founded upon a belief in God. The
- >SLK>country founded upon atheism and a belief in man no longer exists.
-
- >REALLY? Since when?
-
- >The USA was founded mainly by atheists, and laws were put in its
- >charters to keep it that way. Since then, we've moved farther away
- >from religious influence, not closer. Take a look at the number of
- >judgements in the last few decades restricting things like prayer in
- >schools, etc.
-
- Greg, I have no idea where they attempted to teach you history, but
- I don't think those NoDoze worked. Not by *ANY* stretch of overblown
- historical imagination were the founders of our country atheists.
- That's simply wrong. The judgments given in the last few decades prove
- not one thing about the founding fathers of this country - who would
- undoubtedly be appalled at the incredible way their ideals were twisted.
-
- >SLK>Hillary Clinton et.al. have reasoned, secularly, that children should be
- >SLK>given the same legal rights and representation as adults, including the
- >SLK>right to divorce their parents.
-
- >LCF>I totally agree with her, children are not slaves or property, parents are
- >LCF>there to provide for and protect children.
-
- >SLK>Sorry, that isn't what she said. She said that no individual should be
- >SLK>considered incompetent until proven otherwise.
-
- >So you'd rather have a country where all individuals must prove their
- >mental competency? Those who can't "prove" it are SOL? Only those
- >with "state-approved competency" will have rights?
-
- We have that now. It's called "genetic testing". Any unborn child
- which fails the test dies via abortion - at least the counselors work
- damn hard to see that they do.
-
- Furthermore, all individuals in a court of law must prove competency.
- Always have had to. The simple test is age - you have to be at least
- X years old where X used to be 21. If you're that old or older,
- competency is assumed unless someone questions it, at which point proof
- of competency has to be shown.
-
- >You'd, of course, be using your own religious criteria, since you
- >place so little weight on "secular reasoning."
-
- Right now we're using _you're_ religious reasoning, only they call
- it "science". Science is as dependent on faith as any other form of
- human thought.
-
- >SLK>There exists no religion of which I am aware
- >SLK>which holds that children are property and/or that a parent's
- >SLK>decision to abandon said children is acceptable.
-
- >Yes, but the Christian commandment "Honor thy mother and thy father"
- >makes the children slaves to their parents, which is synonymous with
- >property. The choice is to do what mommy and daddy say or burn in
- >Hell. That's "religious reasoning" for you.
-
- Greg, I'm really sorry you were abused as a child, but don't take it out
- on the rest of the world, alright? Your gross distortions of religion
- do no one any service. How you turn the word "honor" into an equivalent
- of slavery is impressive - certainly the members of our military would
- be glad to know that you consider them slaves for honoring our Constitution.
-
-
- For your information, no representative of the Catholic Church has ever
- stated categorically that ANYONE is in Hell. Christians have the right to
- judge actions, not the right to judge people - only God can consign someone
- to Hell. Anyone who attempts to arrogate God's prerogatives to himself or
- herself is guilty of an offense against God, but how that offense is
- judged, how God's infinite mercy combines with his infinite wisdom and
- infinite justice and renders up a verdict, is unknown to me and to
- everyone else.
-
- >--
- >-----------------Greg-Harp----------------harp@netcom.com------------------
- > "I think I've reached that point / Where every word that you write /
- > Of every blood dark sea / And every soul black night / And every dream
- > you dream me in / And every perfect free from sin / And burning eyes /
- > And hearts on fire / Are just the same old song" -- The Cure
-
-
- Steve Kellmeyer
- --
-
- Steve Kellmeyer
- kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
-