home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12386 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10800 alt.politics.clinton:19169 alt.politics.bush:14979 alt.politics.homosexuality:8486
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!smithw
- From: smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith)
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
- Subject: Sexuality
- Date: 29 Dec 1992 17:33:41 GMT
- Organization: Colorado Springs IT Center
- Lines: 25
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <1hq25lINNnra@hp-col.col.hp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: fajita19.cs.itc.hp.com
-
- wgb3@pyuxf.uucp (25336-buoni) writes:
- >
- > My guess is that what is being sought is acceptance, not tolerance. The
- > problem is that living a gay lifestyle is not OK (my values). That is not
- > to say that homosexuals are inherently evil, but that God did not intend us
- > to function this way. Nor did he intend for us to be sexually active
- > outside of marriage, indulge in "immoral" behavior, ....
-
- Which makes me think of something that was said last week about the issue
- of 'sexuality'...I get the impression that the lesbigay posters view the
- majority of straight people as sexually repressed, and that a lot of the
- straight posters feel that lesbigay people are generally more concerned
- with the issue of sex; sex is more 'important' to them than to straight
- people. Are both of these views just overgeneralizations, or is there
- something to either/both?
-
- > These are my beliefs. I don't expect you to adopt them, nor do I expect you to
- > accept them. All I ask in return is that you give me the same respect in
- > return. In my view, teaching my children views which are in direct conflict
- > with our (my wife and I) values is a violation of this respect.
-
- Amen..
-
- Walter
-
-