home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12244 alt.politics.clinton:19084 alt.politics.bush:14903 alt.politics.homosexuality:8428 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10676
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!caen!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
- From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
- Subject: Re: Showering in the Military (Re: Gays in the Military..what nobody is talking about: )
- Message-ID: <Bzrx3q.8G0@unix.amherst.edu>
- Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Turkey Division
- References: <Bzn89s.87y@andy.bgsu.edu> <1992Dec22.171153.18004@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec23.183439.17001@anasazi.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 17:11:49 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Dec23.183439.17001@anasazi.com> briand@anasazi.com (Brian Douglass) writes:
-
- >BTW, in some services, hetro soldiers can still be prosecuted for consential
- >sodomy or oral copulation with a women while on base. Should Clinton repeal
- >this ban also, while he repeals it for homosexuals?
-
- I wouldn't have any objection -- the two regulations seem equally
- stupid and pointless -- but the one doesn't follow from the other.
- There's no particular connection between the two regulations that
- would suggest they should be repealed simultaneously.
-
- --
- ____ Tim Pierce /
- \ / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / Rocks say goodbye.
- \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
-