home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12071 alt.politics.clinton:18996
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rutgers!ub!csn!cherokee!uswmrg!nuntius
- From: greg_bradt@msmgate.mrg.uswest.com (Greg Bradt)
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
- Subject: Re: Gays in the Military..what nobody is talking about:
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.114313.13413@uswmrg.mrg.uswest.com.mrg.uswest.com>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 16:43:12 GMT
- References: <1992Dec16.203511.19755@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>
- Organization: US West Marketing Resources
- Lines: 25
- XUserAgent: Nuntius v1.1b3
- NntpPostingHost: greg_bradt.mrg.uswest.com
-
- In article <1992Dec16.203511.19755@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> Ted Krueger,
- krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu writes:
- >>The bottom line is, the "problem" with gays in the military resides
- >>completely and entirely in the minds of those who oppose it. It is,
- >>ultimately, their choice whether they are determined to remain entrenched
- >>in their ignorance or advance with the rest of us.
- >
- >Well, I think we have become convinced that those of the opposing position
- >are dogmatic. I guess that, since Slick Willie is about to be Prez, we
- >will soon find out which point of view will turn out to be more correct.
- >If you are correct, you will have my submission. I trust that the
- >converse is true.
-
- Absolutely! Keep in mind, however, that I =do= expect there to be some
- degree of resistance to the change, and that it might even, for a fairly
- short time, cause some degree of disruption in the ranks. However, once we
- have put another anachronistic prejudice behind us, we will be a stronger,
- more unified nation, with a correspondingly improved military.
-
- Greg Bradt aka ()The Lensman()
-
- greg_bradt@msmgate.mrg.uswest.com | "Freedom means sometimes
- Genie: G.BRADT | having to put up with
- Compuserve: 70206,172 | things that really
- BBS: (303)290 9243 | piss you off".
-