home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / alt / rushlim / 12059 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-21  |  1.1 KB  |  28 lines
  1. Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!csd475b!newsserv!young
  3. From: young@ssdd475a.erim.org (Peter Young)
  4. Subject: Re: Rush Courts the FAAAR Right
  5. Message-ID: <YOUNG.92Dec21123342@ssdd475a.erim.org>
  6. In-reply-to: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu's message of Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:22:12 GMT
  7. Sender: news@newsspool.erim.org
  8. Organization: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  9. References: <1992Dec18.162715.20785@rchland.ibm.com>
  10.     <BzIwzv.Msz@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
  11. Date: 21 Dec 92 12:33:42
  12. Lines: 14
  13.  
  14. In article <BzIwzv.Msz@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu (JIM GRAHAM) writes:
  15.  
  16. >   Not to get into a religious debate, but people could interpret the ten
  17. >   commandments as good, common sense, irrespective of any religious
  18. >   affiliation, couldn't they?
  19.  
  20. No.  "Thou shalt have no other gods before me."  "Thou shalt [observe
  21. the Sabbath and keep it holy]."  (Not sure of the wording on this
  22. one.) How do you make these non-religious?  Or even
  23. non-denominational?
  24.  
  25. --
  26. Peter Young
  27. young@erim.org
  28.