home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!charnel!rat!ucselx!network.ucsd.edu!rutgers!flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU!reed!henson!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!rjb
- From: rjb@carson.u.washington.edu (LeGrand Cinq-Mars)
- Newsgroups: alt.pagan
- Subject: Re: Documented Evidence
- Message-ID: <1i2olaINNaqk@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: 2 Jan 93 00:46:34 GMT
- References: <1i24m7INNrk8@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <9301011509.AA20770@chaos.intercon.com> <1i2b79INNvr@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
- Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
- Lines: 52
- NNTP-Posting-Host: carson.u.washington.edu
-
-
- $50 for Pike's _Morals and Dogma_? Around here it's a drug on the market --
- great expression that nowadays makes very little sense. Generally it
- runs $8 to $15 at used bookstores.
-
- (Now that I've posted this, I'll never see another copy, I'm sure.)
-
- Ob documented evidence:
-
- 1) "Documentation" doesn't have to be documents. It can be other
- traces or records of activities or affiliations.
-
- 2) But documentation of what? The wonderful objects in Quinn's
- _Early Mormonism_ are documentation of magical practices, for
- example, but certainly not documentation of the existence of
- Gardnerian Wicca. Documentation of a history of esoteric
- interests in a family isn't necessarily documentation of
- involvement with some sort of "witch" spirituality -- though
- records current Wicca involvement may be one more link in a
- long chain of esoteric affiliations within a family.
-
- One problem is that the way we slice the cake isn't necessarily the way
- our ancestors sliced it -- so goodies that show up in one slice in for
- us may have shown up in another slice for them. Thus certain activities
- that show up in the "magic" slice for us may have shown up in the
- "science" slice for them. The same thing is true of the "p/Pagan" and
- "c/Christian" slices. (The "christian" isn't just a gesture towards symmetry:
- in certain communities even recently wasn't "christian" used (though
- capitalized, no doubt, if anyone happened to write it down), like
- "soul," to indicate any generic person?) Not everything that falls into
- our Pagan and Christian slices fell into the same slices for people a few
- centuries ago.
-
- There are two different sorts of claims here, as Robert and Amanda and
- others have pointed out: historical claims and spiritual claims.
- Historical claims that include claims that they are true no matter what
- documentation there is or isn't, and no matrer what the documentation
- says, are pretty silly, though fervent believers are often tempted
- to make them, or at least to accept them.
-
- Spiritual claims are something else entirely: the test of their
- validity is not historical, but spiritual.
-
- Minor poets and dull boring verse have histories and can be documented,
- just as major poets and moving verse have histories and can be documented.
- The testhistorical claims about poetry is documentation (who wrote it, when,
- and so on); the test of poetic claims is poetic effect. The fact that
- a poem is 50 years old and not 5,000 years old has very little bearing
- on whether it makes your hair stand on end when it suddenly comes to
- mind when you're busy making little ones out of big ones.
-
- --LeGrand
-