home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!hiho
- From: hiho@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark Peterson)
- Newsgroups: alt.magick
- Subject: Re: Magic and Morals (was: Re: Harish)
- Date: 2 Jan 1993 21:34:32 GMT
- Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
- Lines: 79
- Message-ID: <1i51p8INN7o6@uwm.edu>
- References: <1hvln3INN5vm@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Reply-To: hiho@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
- Originator: hiho@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
-
- From article <1hvln3INN5vm@shelley.u.washington.edu>, by grimoire@byron.u.washington.edu (John Greer):
- > In article <1hvf0nINNk8m@uwm.edu> hiho@csd4.csd.uwm.edu writes:
- >>
- >>But, is there any way to separate the mechanics of magick from its
- >>application? I can't imagine how you can. --and that being said
- >>we're left with thelema. Absolute and purely relative.
- >
- > Huh? Maybe I'm missing the point, but it seems to me that mechanics
- > and application (perhaps "means and ends" might be a more generally
- > applicable phrasing) can be distinguished fairly clearly in this case
- > as in many others. Of course they affect one another...but the same
- > thing is true of me and the terminal I'm using just now, two quite
- > distinguishable things. (At least in terms of the world of ordinary
- > consciousness!)
-
-
- Hmm. Maybe. My own sense of it is that you don't really understand
- the theory until you've applied it...
-
- > Once learned, these could be used for any purpose you care to imagine,
- > and some you probably don't...
-
- A yup... and nope. It's probably common experience that, quite
- suddenly, there are some things you find you just *can't* do
- anymore...
-
- >>incapable (on its own) of achieving an initiated point of view. See
- >>William Blake. ;-)
- >
- >
- > On the other hand, see Plotinus, whose initiated point of view (the
- > source of a pretty fair majority of the Western esoteric tradition)
- > was squarely founded on a rational dialectic, and who insisted on the
- > study of dialectical logic as the way to mystical awareness...
-
- A yup, but the operative word there is dialectic, and dialectic is a
- kind of reasoning that incorporates contradiction into its own process
- -- and thus has been known to scare the dickens out of pure reason.
- So it isn't exactly reason straight up, and it adds more than just a
- little twist. (hmm. New Year's metaphors....) Even Socratic
- dialectic contains these interesting seeds of initiation -- see
- Plato's Seventh Letter. And speaking as an old Hegelian... well,
- probably shouldn't. ;-)
-
-
- > (There's a fairly precise Hindu equivalent of this in Jnana-yoga; I
- > believe the Tibetan Buddhists also teach something of the sort.)
-
- It's a good example. But this too depends on showing the
- contradiction and paradox potential in reason's own constitution.
- Something Reason itself never sees.
-
-
- > There's still a lot of Romanticism flapping around in esoteric circles
- > -- probably a holdover from the agonizingly Gothicke milieu of Bulwer-
- > Lytton and his ilk. Yes, there are ways of attaining whatever-term-you-
- > want-to-use which dispense with reason, and there are also ways which
- > make use of it; take your pick. (Or combine them, which seems a little
- > more productive to me...)
-
- Hmm. I don't think we can dispense with it. I mean, we owe a lot to
- rational thought. In door plumbing, electric lights, hydrogen bombs.
- All that good stuff. But for magick to work you need to put a bit in
- its mouth.
-
- >
- > Feeling more than usually pedantic,
- >
-
- I thought it was quite a good message. ;-)
-
-
-
- hiho
- --
- mark ce peterson | uw-washington county | hiho@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
- dept of philosophy | west bend, wi. 53095 | (414) 335-5200
-
- The shorter the tether, the sooner the goat starves.
-