home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / alt / lang / asm / 515 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-29  |  1.3 KB
  1. Xref: sparky alt.lang.asm:515 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:34359
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!jrdzzz.jrd.dec.com!jit533.jit.dec.com!diamond
  3. From: diamond@jit533.jit.dec.com (Norman Diamond)
  4. Newsgroups: alt.lang.asm,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
  5. Subject: Re: DRAM refresh rates
  6. Message-ID: <C00CHH.MC7@jrd.dec.com>
  7. Date: 29 Dec 92 06:24:53 GMT
  8. References: <1992Dec15.205835.643@zooid.guild.org> <1gske7INNgje@coli-gate.coli.uni-sb.de> <1992Dec27.105039.25690@microsoft.com> <1992Dec29.012957.14287@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
  9. Sender: usenet@jrd.dec.com (USENET News System)
  10. Reply-To: diamond@jit.dec.com (Norman Diamond)
  11. Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Japan , Tokyo
  12. Lines: 10
  13. Nntp-Posting-Host: jit533.jit.dec.com
  14.  
  15. In article <1992Dec29.012957.14287@cbfsb.cb.att.com> rnichols@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (robert.k.nichols) writes:
  16. >My apologies if the numbers aren't quite correct.  It's been some time
  17. >since I've worked in this area (since the days of 2 ms refresh
  18. >requirements, in fact), and my memory is a bit hazy.
  19.  
  20. It's been some time, but at what temperature?  You should have refreshed....
  21. --
  22. Norman Diamond                diamond@jit.dec.com
  23. If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.
  24. Pardon me?  Or do I have to commit a crime first?
  25.