home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / alt / hotrod / 457 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-28  |  1.1 KB  |  35 lines
  1. Newsgroups: alt.hotrod,wiz.hotrod
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!emory!rsiatl!hotrod
  3. From: hotrod@dixie.com (The Hotrod List)
  4. Subject: Re: 302 parts compatible?
  5. Message-ID: <yzmr6ma@dixie.com>
  6. Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 03:16:57 GMT
  7. Organization: Dixie Communications Public Access.  The Mouth of the South.
  8. To: hotrod@dixie.com
  9. Reply-To: hotrod@dixie.com
  10. Posted-Date: Sunday, Dec 27 22:16:53
  11. X-Sequence: 3109
  12. X-Gifs-To: met@sunset.cse.nau.edu
  13. X-Gifs-From: ftp.nau.edu
  14. Approved: jgd@dixie.com
  15. Lines: 18
  16.  
  17.  
  18. -> >  For you guys running in the 5-liter classes, an Aussie 302 crank
  19. -> in a > 351C block could give you a huge advantage over the Windsors.
  20. -> >
  21. >
  22. > Would you expand on this statement?  Thanks!
  23.  
  24.  Certainly!
  25.  
  26.  The Cleveland has a taller deck than the 302.  The Aussie 302C comes
  27. with 6.020 inch rods to start with, and you can go 6.25 easily.  You're
  28. starting with a 2:1 rod ratio!   You can use the Cleveland heads, or B&A
  29. is coming out with an intake to put Windsor heads on the Cleveland
  30. block.
  31.                                                                  
  32.  
  33. ----------
  34. Posted by: emory!chaos.lrk.ar.us!dave.williams (Dave Williams)
  35.