home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!cs.utk.edu!memstvx1!dodsonsl
- From: dodsonsl@memstvx1.memst.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: Re: Whining bastards
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.084611.4804@memstvx1.memst.edu>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 08:46:11 -0600
- References: <1992Dec29.193447.16332@rchland.ibm.com> <C01vBw.7vv@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec30.181412.6382@wdl.loral.com> <1ht3n0INN70g@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Organization: Memphis State University
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1ht3n0INN70g@shelley.u.washington.edu>, ryanm@hardy.u.washington.edu (Ryan Mcneilly) writes:
- > In article <1992Dec30.181412.6382@wdl.loral.com> bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com writes:
- >>I wouldn't be so pissy about this if you dittoheads would just admit
- >>that you simply don't want the poor to receive any help whatsoever
- >>from the government. Jeez. At least the Libertarians can do that.
- >>Get some spine, you simpering fools.
- >
- >
- > You don't seem to understand that we conservitives (most) do care about
- > the poor, hungry, and homeless. We just don't think the Fed Gov should
- > solve the problem by throughing in money and socialistic jobs. Instead
- > we give through private organizations or directly to bypass the waste and
- > fraud that has run rampid through congress and the white house.
-
- In most times of prosperity, private donations to charities increased. This
- didn't happen in the 1980's. Bush's 'thousand points of light' never really
- took off.
-
- > I think many would agree (correct me if I am wrong) that a small tax hike
- > would be tollerable if the money actually went to the hungry and homeless,
- > especially the children. The parents should get vocational training
- > instead of a dinkey pay nothing job where they are stuck. Only after they
- > have skills usefull to this country will they be usefull. --Ryan
-
- Sounds like you might be a Clinton supporter.
- Don't faint, I was only kidding :)
-
- -Scott
-
-