home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!psuvax1!hsdndev!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!lucerne.rice.edu!byrd
- From: byrd@lucerne.rice.edu (Marc J Byrd)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: Re: Twists on gays in military
- Keywords: practicality
- Message-ID: <C04oGr.HDw@rice.edu>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 14:34:02 GMT
- References: <C00xG4.3oA@rice.edu> <1992Dec29.190851.31809@rchland.ibm.com> <1992Dec31.010140.4531@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Sender: news@rice.edu (News)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Rice University
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Dec31.010140.4531@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:
- |>
- |> >|> Q: How about those who like to have sex with dead people
- |> >|> (necro-sexuals?)? Don't they have a right to serve in the
- |> >|> military? Where would they be housed?
- |> >
- |> >Once again we come back to the "Gays are criminals" viewpoint.
- |> >I've heard this argument a hundred times in this group. This
- |> >is just like comparing a homosexual to a pedophile or a serial
- |> >rapist. ONCE AND FOR ALL: [stuff deleted]
- |>
- |> No, he has a point. If the military starts allowing avowed
- |> necrophiles to serve, then the military would have to build
- |> seperate shower and sleeping facilities for all the dead people
- |> already serving in the military. So either they can't allow
- |> necrophiles to serve, or they will have to allow all the dead
- |> people to retire or discharge them.
-
- Finally someone picked up on the tone of my original post! ;^)
-
-
- --
- Marc J. Byrd - byrd@rice.edu | United We Stand.
- Rice University | Whether or not you accept it, you are
- Dept of Elec & Comp Engr | responsible for the actions and
- XUV Holographic Microscope Project | inactions of your government.
-