home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.cyberpunk
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a3916
- From: Clayten_Hamacher@mindlink.bc.ca (Clayten Hamacher)
- Subject: Re: Caller ID block?
- Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:53:43 GMT
- Message-ID: <18837@mindlink.bc.ca>
- Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet)
- Lines: 12
-
- >BUT, if I had caller ID I could put them in a kill list after the first
- >call and never have to deal with it again. And furthermore, having caller
- >ID log the numbers would give me better evidence against the offending
- >repeat callers if I did decide to take action.
-
- Haven't people caught on by now? Caller ID is NOT VALID IN COURT! The record
- the switch keeps (atuomatically, and specifically if you key in the code
- afyter the call) are the only things that do!
-
- --
-
- Clayten_Hamacher@Mindlink.bc.ca Land of the rising snow.
-