home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!mcsun!fuug!prime!mits!iikkap
- From: iikkap@mits.mdata.fi (Iikka Paavolainen)
- Newsgroups: alt.atheism
- Subject: Re: iq<->religion: connection?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec25.164834.9001@prime.mdata.fi>
- Date: 25 Dec 92 16:48:34 GMT
- References: <1992Dec19.224717.1993@prime.mdata.fi> <1992Dec20.021251.1@acad2.alaska.edu> <1992Dec24.234010.20861@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: usenet@prime.mdata.fi (Usenet poster)
- Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
- Lines: 100
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mits.mdata.fi
-
- In article <1992Dec24.234010.20861@u.washington.edu> jeon@carson.u.washington.edu (Sangyong Jeon) writes:
- >There is a better explanation of this seeming correlation.
- >
- >Power.
- >
- >(As with all sweeping generalizations, no doubt this generalization
- >must fail to explain some events. But I believe it is relevant.)
- >
- >When one feels that one has the power to understand
- >and CHANGE one's environment, that person more than likely will not
- >believe (fervently) in some form of deity.
-
- Understanding needs energy and intelligence and will power. Many people
- just go with the flow, no matter what the religion (as long as they don't
- feel very uncomfortable), and don't bother to inspect anything further.
- I myself don't approve of this kind of mediocrity.
-
- >
- >It is only because that in the society we live, a Ph.D. or a rich
- >person has (real or imagined) some power that they feel no urgent
- >desire to resort to some form of all powerful deities.
-
- IMHO, environment affects more than your wealth.
-
- >
- >A Ph.D. or a rich person can become a fundamentalist if s/he
- >feels, for whatever reason, powerless and helpless about his/her
- >environment. And if somebody less skilled or empowered challenges
- >their belief, heaven help him, for the believer will exert all the
- >power that s/he does have to quell that blasphemy.
-
- And what gives one power? The attributes I mentioned?
-
- >
- >There is one more reason for an already powerful person to become
- >an apparently fervent believer. It is when s/he sees in the religion
- >an opportunity to expand his/her power. Medieval Inquisition comes to
- >mind.
-
- Well that is not real belief in that case.
-
- >
- >On the other hand, the poor and under-educated feel they don't have
- >much power and choice (whether they actually have some power and
- >choice is irrelevant to how they feel) as far as their environment in
- >this society is concerned. Thus, many of them resort to some form of
- >all powerful deity that will fulfill their desires for them.
-
- The poor don't have the time or knowledge to get a real grip of their
- religion, let alone break free from it.
-
- >
- >To the optimists who expressed the hope that the atheist flag would
- >fly in the end, I hope you and me are right. But as long as there
- >remain people who feel powerless and helpless in a society, I am
- >afraid it will remain just that - a hope. Mind you, eradication of
- >poverty alone won't eliminate the feeling of powerlessness some feels.
- >Even eradication of poverty combined with (good) universal education
- >won't do that. In this sense, violence and religion cannot be
- >separated. They are just two different manifestations of one human
- >desire, the power.
-
- Thus if we eradicate religion we will eradicate much of the violence in
- this world.
-
- >Just as education and universal rich won't eliminate the violence in
- >society, they won't make the religion obsolete.
- >It can only be achieved by changing (at least our perception of) human
- >nature.
-
- What people really need is the ability to think with their own minds, not
- just mindlessly follow the opinions of the masses, "just because their doing
- it too". The amount of people that believe in certain ideas never tells the
- correctness or logic of those ideas.
-
- >
- >One caution to those who make the connection of brightness and the
- >rich.
- >
- >The connection sounds perilously close to asserting that they
- >deserve to be rich because they are smart kids.
- >The brightness as much depends on environmental stimuli as it depends
- >on the genetic talents.
- >Don't you think rich kids show more skill because they generally tend
- >to have good care and education from the start, a vicious circle?
-
- Well smart people tend to grab the riches, because they have the means.
- But, as I said, I think the environment is more important a factor.
-
- >
- >
- >jeon
- >
-
-
- --
- __/|_ , ,--------------------------------------------------------------,
- /o \/:--| Iikka Paavolainen / iikkap@mits.mdata.fi, in Espoo, Finland |
- \__~__/\:--| "I won't have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent." |
- ` ` `--------------------------------------------------------------'
-