home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.atheism
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix!m23364
- From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
- Subject: Re: Proof of Gods
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.173511.28569@linus.mitre.org>
- Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org
- Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
- References: <n1075t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <1992Dec18.000551.3979@scorch.apana.org.au>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:35:11 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Dec18.000551.3979@scorch.apana.org.au> lgarde@scorch.apana.org.au (Leon Garde) writes:
- }David.Rice@ofa123.fidonet.org writes:
- }|Show this atheist (me) said scientific proof of "unique entity"
- }|and I most definately will NOT become a theist. If there were
- }|such proof, said being would not be supernatural, and not any
- }|kind of god. Technologically advanced, perhaps. Alien from
- }|space, probably. I'm not some South Pacific islander who will
- }|protrate myself in front of a crashed airplane.
- }
- }
- }as that proof could not possible prove god, but would prove the
- }existance of some supernatural, intellectually advanced ( technology
- }is inanimate?? , we need a new word for a.i. stuff), etc, being.
-
- How about a unique identifier/description of this "Yahweh"? Some
- method of uniquely identifying heim/her/it?
-
- I doubt if such exists - and as Pitt has shown, _I_ can pass the
- same tests that "Jesus" can (I even have followers! ;-))
-
-
-