home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix!m23364
- From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
- Newsgroups: alt.atheism
- Subject: Re: Proof of Gods
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.173205.28409@linus.mitre.org>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 17:32:05 GMT
- References: <n1075t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <1992Dec18.000551.3979@scorch.apana.org.au>
- Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
- Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org
-
- In article <1992Dec18.000551.3979@scorch.apana.org.au> lgarde@scorch.apana.org.au (Leon Garde) writes:
- }David.Rice@ofa123.fidonet.org writes:
- }
- }|
- }|Show this atheist (me) said scientific proof of "unique entity"
- }|and I most definately will NOT become a theist. If there were
- }|such proof, said being would not be supernatural, and not any
- }|kind of god. Technologically advanced, perhaps. Alien from
- }|space, probably. I'm not some South Pacific islander who will
- }|protrate myself in front of a crashed airplane.
- }
- }
- }I like that.
- }Is that the same as saying 'show me proof of god, but still i wouldnt
- }become theist, as the existance of that proof would disprove the
- }existance of god' ?
-
- Babel fish!
-