home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!bz754
- From: bz754@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Derek J. Wojciech)
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Request Information for Young Earth
- Date: 20 Nov 1992 20:39:36 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
- Lines: 23
- Message-ID: <1ejie9INNluv@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu
-
-
- In a previous article, tsc@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (tong.s.chen) says:
-
- >
- >According to the biblical dating, the earth should only be 6,000 to 10,000
- >years old, not millions or even billions years old. Can someone kindly
- >supply me a copy on some scientific (or non-biblical based) arguments for
- >young earth.
- >
- 6,0000 to 10,000 years old??? I guess if you fall into Archbishop Ussher's
- School of Biblical Dating..... But let's graduate and look at the evidence
- of an old earth, and listen to some good Hebrew scholarship which places
- the date of the creation of Adam somewhere between 10,000 and 35,000 years
- ago.
- L8tr,
- Derek
-
-
- --
- 'Fire and Love, the two extremes | wojciech@ossek.nrl.navy.mil / ***.
- that we live between, Fire and |-----------------------------/ ** '
- Love, there's more to life than | Surfing or Snowboarding ****
- the eye can see.' Guardian | ridin' the Wave........._-*********
-