home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!nscf!lakes!kalki33!system
- From: kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: What is consciousness?
- Message-ID: <1o4HuB4w165w@kalki33>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:22:59 EST
- References: <1992Nov16.170942@IASTATE.EDU>
- Reply-To: kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us
- Organization: Kalki's Infoline BBS, Aiken, SC, USA
- Lines: 93
-
- kv07@IASTATE.EDU (Warren Vonroeschlaub) writes:
-
- > But so why cannot "consciousness" exist for the life forms simulated by my
- > computer? If consciousness is independant of matter than the fact that they
- > only exist in the computer should not be a barrier. I would really like to
- > know: what _exactly_ is it that makes them consciousless?
-
- Because they are not life at all, but simulations. They are, depending
- on your level of description, photons in your optic nerve, or electrons
- in a circuit, or areas of magnetic alignment on a disk, or sequences of
- instructions in a computer, etc. If something is really alive, then it
- is conscious.
-
- > >> Q4: If I was capable of manufacturing an exact duplicate of a human being
- > >>would that duplicate be conscious? If so, how accurate do I have to be? C
- > >>this be done by a simulation in the computer?
- > >
- > >No, the exact duplicate of the human body would not be conscious. And
- > >this is a big "if" anyway, considering that scientists do not have any
- > >idea how to manufacture even a single cell. In fact, they have not even
- > >identified everything that is in a cell!
- >
- > Why wouldn't it be conscious? You said that a virus was conscious, it
- > wouldn't be too hard to manufacture a virus (I'm willing to bet it will be
- > technically achievable within the next ten years if it isn't already).
-
- If a virus body were manufactured by human beings, it would not be
- conscious either. Both a human body and a virus body without
- consciousness are just dead bodies. The soul, which is the source of
- consciousness, must be inserted into the body before it can be
- designated as living. This is not within the power of any human being.
-
- > Now, let us say I have made this manufactured virus. It would not be, in a
- > way, distinguishable from the real thing (right down to the atomic structure)
- > What is it about the real virus that makes it conscious and the man made one
- > not?
- >
- > If you cannot give a clear separation then you have your answer why science
- > doesn't address the concept of consciousness by your definition: it is not we
- > defined.
- >
- > >The point is that consciousness is not a function of matter, it is
- > >matter that is a function of consciousness. Your watch, your computer,
- > >your simulation program, and the body you build are all produced by the
- > >action of your consciousness. They are products made from matter under
- > >the direction of your consciousness. Of course, you did not personally
- > >create the raw materials from which these things were constructed, you
- > >simply engineered them. The raw materials themselves were produced by
- > >the action of another consciousness, the "Superconsciousness" (God).
- >
- > Hold on. My body is "produced by the action of" my "consciousness" as far
- > I can understand your definitions. Does this mean that my consciousness
- > inhabits the alife programs I write? Or does it mean that my consciousness i
- > not really associated with my body (which means that consciousness would not
- > associated with life, a contradiction with your previous statements).
-
- No. Your consciousness is affecting certain (but not all) of your own
- bodily characteristics, and certain of the characteristics of the things
- you build. But "you" in the proper sense, the soul that is personally
- you, cannot create another soul. Soul is a nonphysical entity which does
- not behave according to the causal structure of physical law.
- Consciousness, which is a nonphysical property of the nonphysical soul,
- cannot be studied by the reductionistic methods. But it can be studied
- scientifically, provided the scientific paradigm is expanded to include
- the acknowledgement that these nonphysical entities exist.
-
- > >Material analogies may help in understanding consciousness, but
- > >consciousness cannot be reduced to a material phenomenon.
- >
- > I didn't ask if these were a consciousness, I asked if the _had_
- > consciousness. If you misunderstood could you go back and check your answers
-
- Since only the soul "has" consciousness, no. No machine we build can
- ever be conscious or have consciousness. We cannot build nonphysical
- entities using physical instruments. Nor can nonphysical entities be
- expected to emerge as a function of any purely physical operation. They
- are an altogether different kind of phenomenon.
-
- Life comes from life!
-
- Sincerely,
- Kalki Dasa
-
-
- -------------------------------------------------------
- | Don't forget to chant: Hare Krishna Hare Krishna |
- | Krishna Krishna Hare Hare |
- | Hare Rama Hare Rama |
- | Rama Rama Hare Hare |
- | |
- | Kalki's Infoline BBS Aiken, South Carolina, USA |
- | (kalki33!kalki@lakes.trenton.sc.us) |
- -------------------------------------------------------
-