home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!biosci!agate!apple!decwrl!aurora!isaak
- From: isaak@aurora.com (Mark Isaak)
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Probability of Evolution
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.170638.11576@aurora.com>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 17:06:38 GMT
- References: <1992Nov13.081348.8611@smds.com> <Zcu9TB5w165w@kalki33>
- Reply-To: isaak@aurora.com (Mark Isaak)
- Organization: The Aurora Group
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <Zcu9TB5w165w@kalki33> kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us writes:
- >So no scientist who is worthy of the title would
- >ever claim that abiogenesis occurred, or even that there is sufficient
- >reason to suppose that it did, right?
-
- If you grant that there was once a period when life did not exist, and
- that it exists now, then abiogenesis, by definition, has occurred.
- No scientist who is worthy of the title would ever claim to know
- (beyond reasonable doubt) by what mechanism it occurred. That shouldn't
- stop anyone from speculating about what mechanisms are the most likely.
- These speculations rarely include the mechanism of a full-fledged
- miracle (which seems to be the mechanism you favor) because that isn't
- even a mechanism, but an excuse to use in the lack of one. Besides, it
- is hard to imagine anything *less* likely than such a miracle.
- --
- Mark Isaak "Every generation thinks it has the answers, and every
- isaak@aurora.com generation is humbled by nature." - Philip Lubin
-