home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix!m23364
- From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
- Subject: Re: Bales is a liar: evidence - one case
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.142216.16902@linus.mitre.org>
- Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org
- Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
- References: <7540@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM> <1992Nov12.134124.13402@linus.mitre.org> <1992Nov13.201451.186018@zeus.calpoly.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:22:16 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1992Nov13.201451.186018@zeus.calpoly.edu> skroger@zeus.calpoly.edu (Seth L. Kroger) writes:
- }m23364@mwunix (James Meritt) writes:
- }>In article <7540@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM> bobb@tekig1.PEN.TEK.COM (Robert W Bales) writes:
- }>}As evidence to show I'm a liar, Jim Meritt posted some questions which he said
- }>}I have not answered. In a previous article, I showed that even if Jim was
- }>}right about the questions, it would not prove me a liar. However, Jim is
- }>}wrong: I have answered them.
- }>
- }>False. Since we disagree, how about SOMEONE ELSE'S evaluation of the
- }>contention. BALES says that he has answered himself, MERITT says that
- }>he has not.
- }
- }My own evalutaion is that he has not answered the questions in any manner
- }close to satisfactory. He hasn't shown a scrap of positive evidence for
- }creation so far.
-
- }>It is my opinion that your "case" presented does NOT validate your assertion.
- }>Does anyone else? And until _I_ think it does, I shall continue to dredge
- }>up your past posturing. I am, of course, open to an opinion from anyone else.
- }
- }IMHO, his assertion that he has answered the questions has not been
- }validated.
-
- Thank you. Notice this, Bales?
- Does ANYONE think that he has?
-
-
-