home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!lking
- From: lking@athena.mit.edu (Loren King)
- Subject: Re: Post-Goedel confidences
- Message-ID: <1992Nov15.223651.9419@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: m11-113-12.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <1992Nov9.113847@IASTATE.EDU> <e0N3TB8w165w@kalki33> <1992Nov13.195833.12085@athena.mit.edu> <1992Nov13.221725.10364@galois.mit.edu> <97714@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 22:36:51 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <97714@netnews.upenn.edu>, weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener) writes:
- |> In article <1992Nov13.221725.10364@galois.mit.edu>, tycchow@nevanlinna (Timothy Y. Chow) writes:
- |> > The analogy with Goldbach's conjecture that you bring up later is
- |> >a good one. In the past, mathematicians would have been confident in
- |> >saying, "Well, we don't have a proof either way yet, but we know that
- |> >there *is* a proof one way or the other. The problem is a mathematical
- |> >one and can be solved by mathematical means." After Godel, nobody is
- |> >willing to say even this.
- |>
- |> That's simply not true. Platonism and logic are a powerful force in
- |> assertions regarding open problems. Just sometimes folks are wrong.
-
-
- Amusing (well, maybe ... a bit) aside: apparently -- well, according to
- Bertrand Russell's notes and Autobiography -- Goedel himself was an
- unabashed Platonist.
-
-
- Loren King
- MIT
-