home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.environment:4729 sci.environment:12959 sci.energy:5711
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!festival!gtclark
- From: gtclark@festival.ed.ac.uk (G T Clark)
- Newsgroups: talk.environment,sci.environment,sci.energy
- Subject: Re: Pu production (was: Greennazis
- Keywords: Plutonium! Satan! Evil! Danger! Run Away! Run Away!
- Message-ID: <28530@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 11:36:21 GMT
- References: <1992Nov18.184902.15982@ra.msstate.edu> <1992Nov20.031642.24587@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> <FqG=1W-@engin.umich.edu> <1992Nov20.175049.1100@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: nntpusr@castle.ed.ac.uk
- Lines: 6
-
-
- Any Pu produced would be mixed in with the rest of the spent
- fuel. By "not bomb-grade" do you just mean this(i.e. separation would be
- needed) or is there a further difference?
-
- G.
-