home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!rja
- From: rja@mahogany126.cray.com (Russ Anderson)
- Subject: Re: Roe v. Wade is unrestricted abortion-on-demand throughout pregnancy
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.134753.8874@hemlock.cray.com>
- Originator: rja@mahogany126
- Lines: 27
- Sender: rja@mahogany126 (Russ Anderson)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mahogany126
- Organization: The 1991 World Champion Minnesota Twins!
- References: <1992Nov20.064803.18871@ncsu.edu> <1992Nov20.204529.17560@watson.ibm.com> <1992Nov20.215541.16604@ncsu.edu>
- Distribution: na
- Date: 23 Nov 92 13:47:52 CST
-
-
- In article <1992Nov20.215541.16604@ncsu.edu>, dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- > In article <1992Nov20.204529.17560@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- > >dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >
- > I'm not claiming that third-trimester abortions are performed
- > for "trivial" reasons; I'm saying that Roe v. Wade does not
- > permit the states to prohibit post-viability abortions.
- >
- > > From Roe v. Wade:
- > > "On the basis of elements such as these, appellants and some *amici*
- > > argue that a woman's right is absolute and that she is entitled to
- > > terminate her pregnancy at whatever time, in whatever way, and for
- > > whatever reasons she alone chooses. With this we do not agree."
- >
- > Right, the ability of a woman to obtain an abortion is dependent
- > on the availability of a physician who's willing to perform the
- > abortion.
-
- I'm glad that you pointed out this restriction (that the woman find
- a willing physician). It refutes your assertion that Roe v. Wade is
- unrestricted.
-
- --
- Russ Anderson | Disclaimer: Any statements are my own and do not reflect
- ------------------ upon my employer or anyone else. (c) 1992
- EX-Twins' Jack Morris, 10 innings pitched, 0 runs (World Series MVP!)
-